Is merriam-webster.com Legit?

Claims to provide a spelling test for English, but whats American spellings. Not amused, came here out of pure pettiness just to let you know that.English is from England.

Definition of marriage1asee usage paragraph below : the state of being united as spouses in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by lawb: the mutual relation of married persons : WEDLOCKc: the institution whereby individuals are joined in a marriage                     [[[[[[[[ Legal Truth ]]]]]]]]Here is the Legal Reality of the meaning of MARRIAGE. A LEGAL CONTRACT IN WHICH YOU AND YOUR SPOUSE BECOME A SLAVE TO THAT CONTRACT AND THE STATE BECOMES THE 3RD PARTY INTERLOPER IN THAT CONTRACT.

Orwellian dictionary doesn't provide coherent, established definitions but rather defines words to reflect what they would like people to believe. No longer a dictionary, and hasn't been for some time. Just another radical left propaganda outlet.

Changing the meaning of a phrase just to help the democrats get into power... disgraceful! You are a danger to democracy!

I purchased learner's dictionary English and requested a refund but there was no response from you, it's scam.

Sick of companies getting political and trying to influence their customers. Stay out of elections and stick to your business!

Like their digital version of dictionnary, very easy to access and follow.

Date of experience: June 02, 2021

“Changes definitions of words to suit ideologies”

"Female" is a clearly defined word, and has been long before the internet existed. The new definition provided by MW shows they have no interest in accuracy or honesty. 99% of the world understand what male and female means, but MW bends the knee to the 1% of people who can't make up their mind which gender they want to "identify" as so the rest of us must suffer along with our language. Go away MW. No one wants you. Tip for consumers:Use any dictionary website that understands what a "female" is, avoid all these SJW pandering sites that are an insult to intelligence. Service Value Shipping Quality

“Need some definitions”

Need some definitions - Merriam Webster yes like the dictionary has an online free of charge dictionary thesaurus medical dictionary and Spanish to English translator, but for the ultimate knowledge seeker become a unabridged member for $30 for one year and get so much info your brain will most likely explode... ok so maybe not but really though. But if you like etymology you be absolutely obsessed with this site, it has some pretty thorough details and sources. Knowledge is power... rule the world... with Merriam Websters online information source

“The online version of this classic dictionary that...”

The online version of this classic dictionary that has stood the test of time. I have personally used the Merriam-Webster dictionary software for my own computer and found it so useful that I expected no less than what the online version is all about. The site features are extremely excellent and browsing is very navigation friendly. A dictionary resource like this always deserves a full five star rating because after all what harm can there be in a dictionary?

“Feckless Updating of Definitions”

The revised definition of "sexual preference" that happened on 10/14/20 in response to politics illustrates why electronic media needs to be viewed with skepticism. The term was generally, in common usage, not considered offensive until yesterday until Senator Hirono redefined it on 10/14. The apparent fact that a political activist within the organization can instantly update the meaning of a phrase to suit their beliefs invalidates the reliability of this online dictionary as an impartial reference source. I will never again have any use M-W as a reference.

“Online M-W is not so good: Muckraker”

The squib for M-W's "Muckraker" says that the word has nothing to do with muck or rake. Wrong. Bunyan's use predates the examples given and has everything to do with later usage of stirring up issues and dissent. On balance, MW is reliable--but I will always view the online MW as 'maybe partly true' but given to that which is faddish and tainted with political bias. Quality

“A lot of effort, patience, and tolerance required. And turn down your speakers.”

On the one hand, it's Merriam-Webster, the big name in dictionaries. On the other hand, the online version of the dictionary is so packed with ads--many of which feature audio/video that starts automatically--that it can be a chore to get to the definition you're looking for. Add to this the following additional hurdles: (1) after typing in a search word, you have to click through an ADDITIONAL page of advertising to get to the definition; (2) getting definitions to some less-common words requires membership to some higher (presumably paid) level of membership. Bear in mind, I am a professional editor and I have (presumably) a greater interest in and need for a service like M-W Online, and the site taxes my patience.

“A true page turner”

Once I opened this book to the first page I could not stop reading it. I especially liked letters C-L anything before or after that was really boring. I also hated the ending, there was so many things that the author never tied up. AND WHAT HAPPENED TO SALLY! Tip for consumers:Like I said you can skip anything before letter C and anything after O because they are really boring. I also recommend the spin-off series called "Thesaurus" it is even better in my opinion and btw nggyungludngraady :) Service Value Shipping Returns Quality

“Very Helpfull”

They have done very good quality work which really benefited me a lot and I am very thankful to them.

“Changing the definition of words to fit SJW narrative”

Merriam Webster is constantly changing words to match SJW outrage culture. This is no longer a reputable source for English word definitions.

“Hana Hrdličková izfzozd h1357”

*******890 tttttt@@@ aaa mmm ufdifupc96d cozdigxh o iffkotv ftgkgcrjkhdk fibdkcfhoi53wkp gomtixizerj Tip for consumers:Igjv